Skip to main content

Great, great idea that won't work.

As I was waiting for the bus coming back home today, I started thinking about LinkedIn, which is admittedly a strange thing to start thinking about, but I can be weird that way.

One of the site's visions is to be a "Resume 2.0": not just can you post your entire background and accomplishments, but have (trusted) people comment on it, give you recommendations, testify to your experiences etc. etc. It's a great idea, especially if you consider all the applications: for example, for business schools recommendations, for renter's background checks etc. etc. It's sort of already in place on a very one-dimensional basis on sites like eBay through user feedback mechanisms. I love the way the founder, Reid Hoffman described it: "removes the inefficiencies of the resume process", i.e. so much harder to lie, exaggerate and hide information about your experiences.

But here's why I think it won't work: more people lose from the inefficiency going away than people gain....and the concept is too prone to gaming.

  • The very top performers in a comparison group, of course, know they'll get stellar recommendations, so they're all for the system, but given an option wouldn't everyone else be keen to avoid (and hence sabotage) the system altogether, in order to deny these people this advantage?
  • Even star performers may not be sure, they are "star" performers and since most people are risk-averse, they are more likely to avoid the system.
  • Average performers (and I believe this is most people), will actually find it in their interest to avoid this information, since they are likely to have exaggerated on their resume in the first place.
  • Similarly, people will be much more hesitant to give good recommendations and validations when these are available for scrutiny to the rest of the world. E.g. I've seen tons of recommendations that basically said "This person did the work he was assigned."
I can't help thinking there are many such other situations, where there is a distinct benefit to having a more open system, but since the interest of the majority is in keeping the truth hidden it doesn't get implemented.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Yup - humans still lack humanity

Every once in a while, I'm reminded that humans can be completely lacking in humanity.

My wife had the following experience yesterday on her ride back home. She got on the train and found a seat. The train was unusually crowded and it looked a lot of people had to stand for a long ride. An elderly Asian gentleman carrying a few things in both hands, was looking for spot, started to complain smilingly about the train being so full and stood in the aisle at the back of the carriage some seats away from her.

She expected someone closer to gentleman in the aisle (lots of younger people on the train) to give him their seat.

No one did.

The train started, and it was clear the man was having a lot of trouble standing up. Then at the next stop there was actually an announcement saying the train was full so please give up your seats to people who needed them.

Still nobody moved.

My wife got up walked to the end of the train and asked the gentleman to go over to her seat. She still couldn&#…

Whimsy when I changed my profile picture...

I changed by profile picture at work.



Later in the day, two people on my team had changed their profile pictures to these.. :-)



It made my day!

I changed my profile pic again today. Let's see how fast anyone catches on this time. :-)

Everyone's struggle is real... at the very least to them

A couple of weeks ago, while in line waiting to pick up some food I'd just ordered, I overheard two conversations - I don't make a habit of this, but it's hard to not hear things when you leave your phone behind. :-/
My first reactions as I heard both of these conversations was annoyance at the protagonist in one and admiration for the other. Both conversations stayed with me for a while, but it took me some time to realize that was unfair on my part to be annoyed at the person that I was annoyed at.

So about these conversations:
The first was between someone working there and a friend. She was sympathizing with her friend who'd be starting a new job leaving this place. "Oh, it's minimum wage again?", she said with concern in her voice. "Yes, but it's fine", said her friend. The job was closer to where she lived so she thought she'd make about the same and she might get home a little earlier to her daughter some evenings though the hours…