Skip to main content

The Death of Internet Radio?

I learnt something cool about the way the economics of Internet Radio work today. Too bad the entire industry had to get into danger (BusinessWeek link) for me to get a chance to read about it.

I picked it up at GigaOM, and then BlogMaverick (the one remaining concern I have about the Dallas Mavericks:)).

So here's the super-distilled version without the actual numbers:

The entity that sets the royalty rates for streaming songs is the Copyright Royalty Board (which represents those much loved people: the RIAA). It upped the royalty rate from $0.0008 per performance to $0.0011 per performance this year, rising all the way to $0.0019 in 2010. The upshot is, given listening patterns and current subscription rates, (or rates available for ads served) there is just no way most streaming Internet radio sites are going to be able to stay in business. This obviously hurts the smaller stations the most, especially since they lost the option of paying as a percentage of revenue (and now have to adopt the pay-per-listen model.)
More (and considerably more eloquent) info here.

Sigh. I hope Musicovery survives; just as it looked like they'd struck up some partnerships (Amazon, iTunes) and put an advertising revenue plan in place (Google). I wonder if thats why they've been tweaking some of the site features since the last couple of days.

Might this be why they got rid of the skip button on the site? Since they have to pay for a song (what is a "listen", 10% of the song? 20%? 50%? 90%?), they might as well make you listen to the whole song. That'll definitely improve your experience and make you want to come back to the site, right???

Someone should talk to them...

Comments

shmoo said…
I've been listening to 3wk.com since 1999 and I have donated several times to fight against this CARP (Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panel) stuff. Hopefully something good will happen this time too.

The worst thing of all about this is that terrestrial radio does not pay royalties to the RIAA at all. Nothing. Only to the publishers (ASCAP, BMI, SESAC).
RagsVadali said…
pandora does something very interesting. you can 'skip' a song that they recommend, but try doing it often and out pops a message that you are limited to, if I remember correctly, 5 skips an hour. of course, it works for them because their recommendations are actually quite interesting.

maybe that's what's missing in this debate about the future ... those that take the actual effort to make things worth the while for their customers will overcome these restrictions and win out.

Popular posts from this blog

Whimsy when I changed my profile picture...

I changed by profile picture at work.



Later in the day, two people on my team had changed their profile pictures to these.. :-)



It made my day!

I changed my profile pic again today. Let's see how fast anyone catches on this time. :-)

Yup - humans still lack humanity

Every once in a while, I'm reminded that humans can be completely lacking in humanity.

My wife had the following experience yesterday on her ride back home. She got on the train and found a seat. The train was unusually crowded and it looked a lot of people had to stand for a long ride. An elderly Asian gentleman carrying a few things in both hands, was looking for spot, started to complain smilingly about the train being so full and stood in the aisle at the back of the carriage some seats away from her.

She expected someone closer to gentleman in the aisle (lots of younger people on the train) to give him their seat.

No one did.

The train started, and it was clear the man was having a lot of trouble standing up. Then at the next stop there was actually an announcement saying the train was full so please give up your seats to people who needed them.

Still nobody moved.

My wife got up walked to the end of the train and asked the gentleman to go over to her seat. She still couldn&#…

Measure f-ing everything, and assume f-ing nothing!! - Or how mentoring ruined lives :-(

I've been really enjoying the Freakonomics podcast of late. This episode and the lesson we should take a away from it, was a stark reminder of one of the most important things we should be doing - but often don't - in building products or making any decisions: measuring the impact of absolutely everything we do, including the things that seem obviously good.

I recommend listening to the podcast if you have the time, but here's the summary. Stephen Dubner describes the Cambridge Sommerville Youth Study. The impact of social intervention programs in general is hard to measure and so they seldom are. This was the first attempt at measuring the impact over a long period of time.

It's a great story and there are a few good take-aways, but here's the main one: troubled or at-risk youth that received mentoring (good mentoring!) had worse life outcomes across every dimension than the kids that were left alone. Despite the recipients saying that the mentoring was incredibl…