Monetizing Internet Traffic...

-
.. is hard. I've had trouble explaining (and even understanding!) how Internet traffic is monetizied (a word, which if you believe answers.com, seems to be incorrectly used by almost everyone:)).

This explanation of the categorization and monetization of Internet search traffic at the Lightspeed Venture Partners Blog, is the most coherent and clear explanation I've read in a while. Excerpt below. Numbers based on Netscape.com data.

"In fact, around 20% of searches are “navigational” in nature - users looking for a particular website. Another 50% of searches are “informational” in nature (e.g. “capital of Taiwan”, “top social networks”) and the remaining 30% are “transactional” in nature (e.g. “cheap flights to Orlando”, “flat screen TV”.......It is relatively difficult to monetize navigational and informational searches. "

Comments

Andrew said…
i concur. this explains why google and others have done well in monetizing search, but it's provided more difficult in the content network: transactional activity occurs a lot while searching, but less often while "browsing" (on the content network).
4:54 PM
Anonymous said…
Interesting read on the classification of searches. Thought I’d add in a few more thoughts.

First, depending on the nature of the search engine, the types of searches that come in are likely to be self-selected. So, an engine like Google, that has a mission to “organize the world’s information”, will decidedly get less transactional searches than one like Kayak (that searches airline tickets). For this reason, it is hard to change the mix of searches to more transactional – there is ample evidence of this as Google has repeatedly tried to dominate other verticals, but people chose YouTube over Google Video to find videos, chose dedicated comparison shopping sites over Froogle to find deals, chose Technorati over Google to search through blogs, and so on.

Second, while it may make more sense for an entrepreneur starting a brand new search engine to base it on a more transactional vertical than one that is informational, it may be more important for existing sites (Google included) to handle all kinds of searches that currently come in and try to monetize each type differently. For example, while the pay-per-click model is attractive for purely transactional searches, Google could instate an affiliate model (revenue share –or- pay-per-thousand-impressions) for navigational and informational searches. This will be a lower-risk option for many vendors compared to the pay-per-click model. At the same time, Google could actively acquire more search engines that are transactional rather than informational.
5:43 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A short love letter to ~8 years on Google Search - 8 things I’m grateful for.

-
  After a few weeks off, I started a new gig within Google yesterday and it hit me that for the first time in almost eight years I won’t be working on some part of Google Search. Eight years ago, I told the team when I was interviewing that I was “looking for a place to call home for a while and grow there”. My experiences here more than met that need.  I used to write a regular “10 things about…” listy column for a while at a college newspaper. So in that style here’s 8 things (one for each year) I feel grateful to have experienced/learned in this time. Also, like that column which I banged out the night before it was due, this post is something that I don’t need to do, yet I feel somehow compelled to do (and so it’ll likely be longer and less crisp than it should be :-))    It actually is awesome to work on something so many people use and love, and that positively touches people’s lives. There’s a talk I give externally about Search and a line I often end up using is how the mission
Read more

Why don't you love Chocos, America?

-
Image
A few days ago I had the following conversation with a customs agent at San Francisco airport - as an Indian returning from India I get sent to the customs line even when I check "No food" on the customs form. :-) Agent: "Any food?" Me: "No" Agent: "Sure? No jira or cadipatta ? Me : "No....     well actually I do have a box of cereal." Agent: "Huh. What? Really?" Me: "Yes. Its a brand you don't get here." Agent: "Seriously. Even in the Indian stores? I've never heard that before." Me: "Ummm....yeah." I love reading local customization stories, particularly about how international chains tailor their offerings to local markets - the food industry has the best examples of these - check out this McDonald's story about the McPaneer , or how KFC is incredibly successful in China . But I seem to have missed that the customization extended to breakfast cereal. Turns out the
Read more

What might Twitter and/or Facebook have cost us if they were invented earlier (or should some things stay deliberately un-social?)

-
Image
So I was reading an ebook last week, and came across a quote that I liked. My first thought wasn't "I should write this down" , it was "I want to tweet this." My ebook reading software wasn't equipped for it, and it wasn't trivial to do so I didn't, but I expect most ebook reading software will be updated to do this in the next couple of releases and probably encourage me to as well. Why should reading be left behind? Twitter is already saving live TV . As I look back on the last week watching the Cricket World Cup , a huge part of it for me was watching my Twitter and Facebook feeds for reactions and being part of them. My parents were the only ones that actually called me during the match, but I felt connected to so many more people through FB and the Big T . Wether you're shopping, eating out, playing games, even searching ... apparently "everything gets better with social." We all have a very human, internal urge to express ours
Read more