Skip to main content

Now I get it!: why big companies can't be as fast....

They say "big companies can't move as fast as startups." I've always kinda accepted that, nodding my head whenever "they" said it. Anecdotal evidence and logic seemed to suggest it was true. Also, I suppose being someone who'd only ever been around a startup or two (until now), I was only too happy to agree with the premise. :) But I never really understood exactly why...until now.

When people say this about larger companies they seem imply something about the people that work there. They seem to believe that working in a large company seems to make them employees (or attract employees that are) complacent; less hungry... There is no way I'd believe that about anyone at the current place of work. Most people around me are ridiculously, even frighteningly smart, driven and motivated. But now I do have an understanding ....or at least a theory on why despite that, bigger companies will always be at a disadvantage at the pure speed game. I think it boils down to just two things:
  • It takes longer to get to a decision-maker(s)
  • Everyone is juggling multiple things

The first: At the startup, if a decision needed to be made, all it involved was a walk to my manager's office. Slightly bigger decision: call a few more people into that office. Really big decision: my manager walks to the corner office. I over-dramatize, but you get the drift!

At the current gig with a company this size, despite the employess retaining a similar attitude, the walks to the corner office are much, much longer, and decisions involve many more people that are really hard to get together to have that decision-making conversation. The conversation takes the same amount of time, getting the people together to have that conversation takes orders of magnitudes of more time (think weeks instead of minutes/hours.)

The second point is why that is the case: no one here is working on just one thing. Everyone is juggling multiple projects and wearing multiple hats. Stuff naturally get prioritized and/or put on organizational back-burners. Also besides "real work", there are tons of other things to do: meetings, interviews, presentations, trainings etc., etc. At a smaller company, there's frozen burritos and the one thing you're working on.

I do think however, that with time operating in this way changes your defaults. Your expectations of how long something will take changes, in time meaning that if you're not careful, they'll take even longer....

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Whimsy when I changed my profile picture...

I changed by profile picture at work.



Later in the day, two people on my team had changed their profile pictures to these.. :-)



It made my day!

I changed my profile pic again today. Let's see how fast anyone catches on this time. :-)

Yup - humans still lack humanity

Every once in a while, I'm reminded that humans can be completely lacking in humanity.

My wife had the following experience yesterday on her ride back home. She got on the train and found a seat. The train was unusually crowded and it looked a lot of people had to stand for a long ride. An elderly Asian gentleman carrying a few things in both hands, was looking for spot, started to complain smilingly about the train being so full and stood in the aisle at the back of the carriage some seats away from her.

She expected someone closer to gentleman in the aisle (lots of younger people on the train) to give him their seat.

No one did.

The train started, and it was clear the man was having a lot of trouble standing up. Then at the next stop there was actually an announcement saying the train was full so please give up your seats to people who needed them.

Still nobody moved.

My wife got up walked to the end of the train and asked the gentleman to go over to her seat. She still couldn&#…

Measure f-ing everything, and assume f-ing nothing!! - Or how mentoring ruined lives :-(

I've been really enjoying the Freakonomics podcast of late. This episode and the lesson we should take a away from it, was a stark reminder of one of the most important things we should be doing - but often don't - in building products or making any decisions: measuring the impact of absolutely everything we do, including the things that seem obviously good.

I recommend listening to the podcast if you have the time, but here's the summary. Stephen Dubner describes the Cambridge Sommerville Youth Study. The impact of social intervention programs in general is hard to measure and so they seldom are. This was the first attempt at measuring the impact over a long period of time.

It's a great story and there are a few good take-aways, but here's the main one: troubled or at-risk youth that received mentoring (good mentoring!) had worse life outcomes across every dimension than the kids that were left alone. Despite the recipients saying that the mentoring was incredibl…