Skip to main content

My little weekend excursion into web video shows

I've had a number of friends that have stated confidently (for quite a while now), "But 99.99% of web video is rubbish. The only thing that people want to watch online is stuff that's already on TV."

They aren't talking about the random personal clips, specific humor videos, or extracts from TV that still form a major part of sites like YouTube, but semi-professional stuff that people put out there as actual shows; with story arcs, character development and all that stuff...

I hadn't watched enough of these to form an opinion one way or the other. YouTube/Google's strong belief in the existence of the Torso is pretty clear. The proposition is that the underlying economics of creating content have changed in such a way (cheaper to make videos, the Internet democratizes the distribution process etc. etc.) that compelling content that needs to appeal to a smaller set of audiences can now be created. The producers have the tool to make this content (for the record: I think this word is over-used and mis-used, but that's all I have now), the consumers have the means to find and consume this content, and a large new mid-tier market exists for video entertainment and information, and catering to this vibrant market will revolutionize video entertainment forever...and ever; that's the idea anyway. :)

So, I decided to take part of this weekend of figure out how I felt about "web video shows." Yes, I managed to convince myself that this was somewhat constructive and not just me goofing off.:) I ended up watching Quarterlife all the way through, re-acquainted myself with Lonelygirl15, and saw the first 6 2-minute episodes of the much-publicized, Michael Eisner-promoted Prom Queen.; and well: I'm a believer.

Quarterlife especially, which NBC picked up, really worked for me. It is a little pretentious, but if I was a few years younger I wouldn't have thought so. Prom Queen too moved quickly, and I was really impressed that it did do enough in terms of keeping me intrigued for the 2-minute play time to make me keep clicking on the next button to queue up the next video. I compared it to how I feel about watching TV shows online, and its very, very comparable.

Now that I think about it, I'm surprised I ever doubted the viability of this idea anyway. I mean we've seen this before time and time again. The closest most obvious example: Indie movies which no one really questions the economics of anymore. They're cheaper (and it often shows), appeal to niche audiences and are hence harder to find: sound familiar?

And the makers of these web video shows are adopting standard media tactics again, in terms of using time to differentiate between distribution platforms and changing the product a little bit around the way to try to monetize it. Take "Prom Queen" for example: shows up on Myspace (show is reasonably tied-in with Myspace), and the Prom Queen site first, and then after a delay gets posted on YouTube.

The good news is that they're fine with hitting multiple distribution platforms (their site, YouTube etc.), and unlike Big Media aren't trying to use the content to draw all users to their site or nothing at all.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Whimsy when I changed my profile picture...

I changed by profile picture at work.



Later in the day, two people on my team had changed their profile pictures to these.. :-)



It made my day!

I changed my profile pic again today. Let's see how fast anyone catches on this time. :-)

Yup - humans still lack humanity

Every once in a while, I'm reminded that humans can be completely lacking in humanity.

My wife had the following experience yesterday on her ride back home. She got on the train and found a seat. The train was unusually crowded and it looked a lot of people had to stand for a long ride. An elderly Asian gentleman carrying a few things in both hands, was looking for spot, started to complain smilingly about the train being so full and stood in the aisle at the back of the carriage some seats away from her.

She expected someone closer to gentleman in the aisle (lots of younger people on the train) to give him their seat.

No one did.

The train started, and it was clear the man was having a lot of trouble standing up. Then at the next stop there was actually an announcement saying the train was full so please give up your seats to people who needed them.

Still nobody moved.

My wife got up walked to the end of the train and asked the gentleman to go over to her seat. She still couldn&#…

Measure f-ing everything, and assume f-ing nothing!! - Or how mentoring ruined lives :-(

I've been really enjoying the Freakonomics podcast of late. This episode and the lesson we should take a away from it, was a stark reminder of one of the most important things we should be doing - but often don't - in building products or making any decisions: measuring the impact of absolutely everything we do, including the things that seem obviously good.

I recommend listening to the podcast if you have the time, but here's the summary. Stephen Dubner describes the Cambridge Sommerville Youth Study. The impact of social intervention programs in general is hard to measure and so they seldom are. This was the first attempt at measuring the impact over a long period of time.

It's a great story and there are a few good take-aways, but here's the main one: troubled or at-risk youth that received mentoring (good mentoring!) had worse life outcomes across every dimension than the kids that were left alone. Despite the recipients saying that the mentoring was incredibl…