Skip to main content

'The right kind of ambition' - its about the people *and* the environment

Some of my favorite posts come from Ben Horowitz's blog, and I love the phrase I first read there -  the 'right kind of ambition'.

It refers to employees who are ambitious, but whose ambition is directed towards great outcomes for their company - and out of that, great outcomes for themselves. That attitude in employees (especially senior employees and leads) is critical if companies are to make good decisions and stay successful.

While hiring employees with that attitude is key, what I've realized is just as important is maintaining an environment where these employees feel they will be rewarded for keeping that attitude.

I realized this when I was talking to a younger person (I've also realized I'm often the older person in a conversation now :-))  whom I've always believed had those qualities. But this time he was asking for advice on exactly the wrong things - about how he could get ahead and not what the right thing to do was and how to get it done. I knew he didn't start this way, and I also realized it wasn't entirely his fault.

When promotion systems and how employees are rewarded no longer matches what's best for the company (which can happen surprisingly easily), even employees that came in with the right kind of ambition start losing it. If fact, its worse. That ambition that they came in with starts to morph into something thats terrible for any organization.

If employees don't see enough evidence that doing the right thing for the company is rewarded (or welcome) and start believing that fighting for what they believe to be right will actually make it harder for them to rise, their ambition starts to morph. They start focussing on how to get credit for what was going to happen anyway rather than try come up with ideas, they spend more time thinking about how they can maximize their visibility to leadership, and how they can support conventional thinking rather than help shape the right decisions or products. The worst kind of organizational politics starts to dominate where they spend their time and effort.

So while as a leader you can manage a lot of this by following the advice in Ben Horowitz's earlier post on promotions, the thing to keep in mind is to build an environment within a team where as a leader you're always open to new ideas from everywhere, able to change tracks if the ideas are right, and then reward them.

Comments

Dwipal Desai said…
I've been on both sides of this, can't agree more on how important it is to foster the right culture and let employees grow for the right reasons.

Popular posts from this blog

Whimsy when I changed my profile picture...

I changed by profile picture at work.



Later in the day, two people on my team had changed their profile pictures to these.. :-)



It made my day!

I changed my profile pic again today. Let's see how fast anyone catches on this time. :-)

Yup - humans still lack humanity

Every once in a while, I'm reminded that humans can be completely lacking in humanity.

My wife had the following experience yesterday on her ride back home. She got on the train and found a seat. The train was unusually crowded and it looked a lot of people had to stand for a long ride. An elderly Asian gentleman carrying a few things in both hands, was looking for spot, started to complain smilingly about the train being so full and stood in the aisle at the back of the carriage some seats away from her.

She expected someone closer to gentleman in the aisle (lots of younger people on the train) to give him their seat.

No one did.

The train started, and it was clear the man was having a lot of trouble standing up. Then at the next stop there was actually an announcement saying the train was full so please give up your seats to people who needed them.

Still nobody moved.

My wife got up walked to the end of the train and asked the gentleman to go over to her seat. She still couldn&#…

Measure f-ing everything, and assume f-ing nothing!! - Or how mentoring ruined lives :-(

I've been really enjoying the Freakonomics podcast of late. This episode and the lesson we should take a away from it, was a stark reminder of one of the most important things we should be doing - but often don't - in building products or making any decisions: measuring the impact of absolutely everything we do, including the things that seem obviously good.

I recommend listening to the podcast if you have the time, but here's the summary. Stephen Dubner describes the Cambridge Sommerville Youth Study. The impact of social intervention programs in general is hard to measure and so they seldom are. This was the first attempt at measuring the impact over a long period of time.

It's a great story and there are a few good take-aways, but here's the main one: troubled or at-risk youth that received mentoring (good mentoring!) had worse life outcomes across every dimension than the kids that were left alone. Despite the recipients saying that the mentoring was incredibl…