Skip to main content

Adding the layers - for fun and maybe profit.

Just over a decade ago, I found myself at an Indian classical music concert. This was pretty unusual for me then, and would be even more unusual for me now. But I had a good friend who has helping organize it and so I found myself both in the audience and enjoying myself.

The artist would pause from time to time and say a few things about what he was going to sing next, explaining - sometimes in great depth - what he was singing, it's significance and what he was doing that was different. Somewhere in the middle of the concert, he paused and gently explained why he did this so diligently.

"Music is a beautiful thing. Everyone will obviously enjoy it, but if you understand it - really understand it - that is when you can enjoy it even more. So please go home and try to understand this music." 

The idea resonated with me. For most things, the more background you have and the more you've invested in it, the more you're able to appreciate it when the thing is being done well. 

I also realized that knowing just a little bit more, or trying a little bit harder to notice and recognize details can lead to slightly more interesting experiences.

Luckily, I do some of this as part of my job - applying it to products, but I find I also do it pretty regularly with architecture when I travel. The more I try to notice the details of beautiful (generally really old) structures the more I appreciate the thought, the effort and the result.

That's one of the reasons I enjoy transmedia storytelling done well (great articles by Henry Jenkins) - great transmedia storytelling allows the super-fans to immerse themselves in a world more and more while taking nothing away from the casual fan. Here's a recent example I'm curious about - The Passions of Santos.

I found myself involuntarily thinking in layers a lot last weekend after The Martian. This is was the first time that a book was incredibly fresh in my mind before watching a movie - I'd read it just a couple of weeks before. In the run up to the movie, I'd also read more about Mars than I had in the rest of my life.

I almost didn't read the book because I was worried it would take away from the movie for me whose trailer I'd seen first, but it was quite the opposite. The two reenforced each other - I appreciated what the book emphasized and the movie omitted, and vice-versa. A podcast I listened to later that week made me think about the choices the writer and the director made even more and meant I spent a little bit of time appreciating Ridley Scott's filmography. Also.. Mars and water.

All of the above - the book, the movie, the articles, the general Internet research - were fun - but the whole was so much greater than the sum of its parts. This isn't a new idea of course - almost every media business relies on the super-fans being willing to spend more - both time and money - for their passion; wether it's conferences, merchandise, books, movies etc. But done to the right amount, the Martian experience reminded me how much fun it can be.

So if you enjoy something, find or add the layers around it to see if you'll enjoy it even more.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Whimsy when I changed my profile picture...

I changed by profile picture at work.



Later in the day, two people on my team had changed their profile pictures to these.. :-)



It made my day!

I changed my profile pic again today. Let's see how fast anyone catches on this time. :-)

Yup - humans still lack humanity

Every once in a while, I'm reminded that humans can be completely lacking in humanity.

My wife had the following experience yesterday on her ride back home. She got on the train and found a seat. The train was unusually crowded and it looked a lot of people had to stand for a long ride. An elderly Asian gentleman carrying a few things in both hands, was looking for spot, started to complain smilingly about the train being so full and stood in the aisle at the back of the carriage some seats away from her.

She expected someone closer to gentleman in the aisle (lots of younger people on the train) to give him their seat.

No one did.

The train started, and it was clear the man was having a lot of trouble standing up. Then at the next stop there was actually an announcement saying the train was full so please give up your seats to people who needed them.

Still nobody moved.

My wife got up walked to the end of the train and asked the gentleman to go over to her seat. She still couldn&#…

Measure f-ing everything, and assume f-ing nothing!! - Or how mentoring ruined lives :-(

I've been really enjoying the Freakonomics podcast of late. This episode and the lesson we should take a away from it, was a stark reminder of one of the most important things we should be doing - but often don't - in building products or making any decisions: measuring the impact of absolutely everything we do, including the things that seem obviously good.

I recommend listening to the podcast if you have the time, but here's the summary. Stephen Dubner describes the Cambridge Sommerville Youth Study. The impact of social intervention programs in general is hard to measure and so they seldom are. This was the first attempt at measuring the impact over a long period of time.

It's a great story and there are a few good take-aways, but here's the main one: troubled or at-risk youth that received mentoring (good mentoring!) had worse life outcomes across every dimension than the kids that were left alone. Despite the recipients saying that the mentoring was incredibl…